• (61) 3322-8825
  • contato@marcelolucas.adv.br
  • SCS Qd. 01, Bl. M, sala 1215, Ed. Gilberto Salomão.
Search
Close
  • Quem somos
  • Áreas de Atuação
  • Publicações
    • Artigos
    • Imprensa
    • Notícias
  • Contato
  • Localização
Menu
  • Quem somos
  • Áreas de Atuação
  • Publicações
    • Artigos
    • Imprensa
    • Notícias
  • Contato
  • Localização
fevereiro 20, 2023 by Vitórian Tito Articles 0 comments

Justice, albeit belated

follow url Author: Oscar Vilhena Vieira for Folha de São Paulo

click here

https://marchtozion.com/vtfrvji Janaina is a poor woman who is homeless and has children. That’s why a member of the Public Prosecutor’s Office believed she should be sterilized.

Lorazepam Online

Get Xanax Script Online As Janaina did not consent or voluntarily agree to undergo the surgery, the prosecutor filed two lawsuits against her and the city of Mococa, with the aim of forcing her to undergo compulsory sterilization.

https://retailpanama.com/wmblloykr

enter The judge, without even holding a hearing, appointing a defender, or demanding documents proving her consent, ordered the woman to be coercively taken to the surgery. By the time the municipality’s appeal reached the São Paulo Court of Justice, the mutilation had already occurred.

https://marchtozion.com/5htci0yvw

source link The case is scandalous. Firstly, the prosecutor used a public civil action, which is an instrument aimed at protecting diffuse, collective, or individual non-disposable rights, to deprive a person of their right to dignity and integrity, in addition to coercing the municipality to carry out a manifestly illegal act.

Buy Diazepam Next Day

Find Tramadol Online It is enough to remember that the Constitution expressly prohibits the Brazilian state from coercively interfering in the decision on paternity (Article 226, paragraph 7), and also, Law 9.263/96, which regulates family planning, prohibits birth control that has a demographic nature.

click It is also perplexing that the judge, given Janaina’s vulnerability, did not appoint a special guardian, in this case a public defender, to represent her interests in court.

https://wonderpartybcn.com/hqoec77lc As expressed in the São Paulo Court of Justice’s decision, the surgery was ordered without Janaina being heard or defended, and without even a hearing being held.

https://www.thevampiresource.com/jxqo1cqy To crown this bizarre process, the first-instance court ordered Janaina to be “coercively” taken to the surgical procedure.

go to link It is worth noting that this is a measure provided for in the Code of Criminal Procedure, only for witnesses or defendants who refuse to comply with a summons.

enter site Moreover, by an interim decision of the Supreme Court, this measure of a criminal procedural nature is suspended (ADPF 444). None of this was an obstacle for the judge to employ coercive transportation to impose the suppression of this woman’s fundamental right.

follow url Coercive sterilization, with eugenic purposes and race assessment, was widely used by the Nazi regime. China used mass coercive sterilization to curb population growth. The United States used it to punish criminals.

go to link Even in Brazil, as pointed out by a parliamentary inquiry commission in 1991, there was tolerance for mass coercive sterilization policies for demographic purposes.

enter This case, although it may be considered a legal aberration, offers a glimpse of the perverse impact that deep and persistent inequality has on the recognition of individuals as subjects of rights.

see url Although the principle of dignity requires that everyone be treated with equal respect and consideration, poverty and marginalization seem to make large portions of our society morally invisible in everyday life, losing their status as rights holders in reality.

https://genevaways.com/yzosdewm6sm May the decisive decision of the São Paulo Court of Justice, which unfortunately cannot turn back time for Janaina, serve as a warning and inspiration for those who are responsible for protecting rights and not violating them.

Share

Related Posts

by Vitórian Titofevereiro 20, 20230 comments

IAB (Brazilian Institute of Criminal Sciences) asks Supreme Court to decide on pretrial detention

Leia Mais
by Vitórian Titofevereiro 20, 20230 comments

Learn more about Tax Law

Leia Mais
by Brenda Abreujunho 18, 20240 comments

Funcionário do Metrô-DF consegue na Justiça adicional periculosidade

Leia Mais
by Brenda Abreujunho 25, 20240 comments

Emirados Árabes é principal destino dos milionários do mundo

Leia Mais
follow link STF and the printed vote: what can we do? source site Previous Post
https://elien.ca/f8vsjpaqa3s Recent STJ and STF's decisionsNext Post https://www.starc.org/uncategorized/0o1nufk

see Marcelo Lucas de Souza (25.369/DF) é o advogado CEO do escritório, com mais de 17 anos de experiência em atuações e prevenções jurídicas nos diversos ramos do direito. Possui pós-graduação com tese sobre direito público. Foi coordenador licenciado em prática jurídica e coordenador adjunto do curso de direito do Centro Universitário Icesp de Brasília. Foi diretor tesoureiro da OAB-DF – CAADF e professor de direito em várias instituições do Distrito Federal.

Instagram Linkedin

Institucional

  • Quem Somos
  • Câmara de Comércio Árabe-Brasileira
  • Áreas de Atuação
  • Imprensa
  • Artigos
  • Localização

Áreas de Atuação

  • Assessoria Jurídica
  • Comércio Exterior
  • Direito Civil
  • Direito Empresarial
  • Direito Internacional
  • Direito do Petróleo e Gás
  • Direito Previdenciário
  • Direito do Trabalho
  • Direito Tributário

Escritório

  • SCS Qd. 01, Bl. M, sala 1215, Ed. Gilberto Salomão.
  • CEP 70301-000 – Brasília – DF
  • E-mail: contato@marcelolucas.adv.br
  • Telefone: (61) 3322-8825
  • Celular: (61) 9 8304-9540
  • Localização

Termos e Condições | Política de Privacidade © Copyright 2018 - Marcelo Lucas - Advogados - Todos os Direitos Reservados.

Change Language
Whatsapp